Arrest of 33 opposition leaders-Government is in hard line May 21, 2012
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY.Tags: AL, BNP
1 comment so far
33 opposition leaders Prime Minister’s office and hurling bomb into the secretariat. The leaders first went into hiding to avoid arrest but later entered into High Court premises to appeal for bail, they had to dodge the security cordon surrounding the high court, the story gave rise to funny stories. The heavy police presence was challenged by the Bar Council Association and the lawyers warned of starting agitation against the presence. The petition was moved but the judges were given divided opinion and the case was sent to the Chief Judge who refer the case to a third judge who ordered the accused to surrender to the lower court and asked the police not to arrest them in the meantime. The accused reported to the lower court with their lawyers and pleaded for the bail but the judge refused the appeal.
Many observers speculate that the sending of so many opposition leaders to the jail is an unexpected incident. This will increase the conflict between the two camps and deteriorate the political situation.
An ordinary citizen
Killing, clemency and justice October 5, 2011
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY.add a comment
Bangladesh President has pardoned the killer of Nurul Islam as the news published on 21 July 2011. The news has steered the politicians and the public as well.
Nurul Islam was a political activist and a local leader of BNP and a potential threat in leadership to the rival political groups in Laxmipur.
The accused killer is a son of a leading political figure of AL.
Government defending itself said that BNP also in their term gave clemency to the murderer belonging to their own party and President has the right to pardon anyone on the recommendation of the Justice ministry.
Barrister Moudud of BNP said that two campaered case are not similar in nature. The judgment in BNP case was given by Martial Law court, the verdict of which is not uncontroversial.
Some claim that with the mercy in Nurul Islam’s case President failed to uphold the constitutional responsibility bestowed upon him and the mercy will encourage the killers to repeat the same unlawful act.
An ordinary citizen
Opinion:
Ordeal of Limon May 30, 2011
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY.Tags: human rights, Limon
add a comment
Limon was shot on the foot and he had to lose his left leg because of that. He came to limelight of the media because of the ordeal he had to undergo after that incident.
RAB earlier stated that he was mistakenly shot while they were chasing a gang of terrorists. LImon was standing nearby. But After initial treatment at Barisal Medical College, he was then transferred to Sher e Banga Orthopedic Hospital. He was amputated and is kept under tight security.
Son of a poor parents, he was a candidate for hsc exam(12th grade) this year. He was studying by earning his livelihod for himself and his family in parallel. His dream has been shattered because of the incident, After getting bail, he found himself in the Barisal jail. As his would was deteriorating he was admitted into the Barisal Medical College for second time. Doctors prefered to send him to Dhak Pangu (Orhopedic) Hospital again for better treatment. In the meantime , 5 enquiry committees submitted their reports and all the reports found Limon guilty and also found all the members of the family- his parents and siblings’ are involved with the terrorist group
In the hospital Limon asked the journalists to bring poison for them and let them die.
The Military Adviser to the PM said that the enquiry reports are true. There is nothing to deny. The State Ministry and the Law Ministry also endorses the inference of the adviser.
And the ordeal of Limon will be continued.
An ordinnary citizen
Opinion:
Abul Momen- Prothom Alo : http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2011-05-27/news/157474 (in bangla )
Chronology of events:
2.6.2011: Limon quizzed again
3.6.2011: Limon pleads with PM
7.6.2011: The Inquiry of the Home Ministry couldn’t find out by whose bullets Limon was injured
Care Taker Government and Supreme Court Judgment May 23, 2011
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, ELECTION, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: Care Taker Government, CTG, Supreme Court
add a comment
Supreme court in a judgment declared caretaker system illegal in Bangladesh. It is to be noted that Bagladesg has introduced caretaker government system to hold national elections under a politically neutral tenvironment. The care taker government instituted for 3 months following the tenure of the elected government is over and headed by the immediate past chief justice. A group of advisers among the non-political personalities from the professionals are selected to support him. The CTG is basically assigned to hold the general election and to maintain the general administration. They are nor empowered to formulate any major rules and regulations and will not change the constitution,
Bangladesh virtually hold 4 national elections under the CTG and all of them were accepted by the people as fair and neutral. In the history of Bangladesh, these elections are best of its kind.
But to influence the composition of the ctg with an aim to influence the result of the ellection, the elected governments had tried in the past to promote their loyal judges to the post of Chief Justice, superceeding the seniors. This attempt has been made in 2001 and 2006 . In 2001, the cj didn’t fulfil the wish of his mentors.In 2006 , the oppostion to the manuever lead to the formation of a caretaker government headed by the president, who later had to handover the charge to a new set of advisers led by Dr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed. This Ctg stays in power for long 2 years and tried to reform the political system but at last left the scene by holding an election in December 2008 in which AL gained a landslide victory.
Controversy arises on the tenure of the ctg and the manipulation of the promotion of the judges ? .
Supreme Court took the opinion of the Amicus Curiae. Most of the americus queri except one gave opinion in favour of CTG. Citizens groups also favour caretaker goverment.
8NP expreesed its opposition to any move form the concept of caretaker government. Ershad hails the idea. Jammat is not in a postion to say anything on the issue. Their top brasses are in the jail on the charge for crimes committed during the liberation war.
The issue will be discussed in the parliament. The motive of AL is not yet clear whether they will prefer a caretaker government or switch over to other form. The judgment of the supreme court open up the dual opportunity for them. They are tatking time to come to a conclusion.I am also suspecting that they will linger the discussion close to the end of their term and on the political reading at the last moment they will come to a decision.
People still would prefer an elelction under CTG. The alternative is an election under an independent election commission. But political government does not yet able to develop the confidence to conduct an independent election under an election commission.
Any attempt by the government to manipulate the result will bring no good to the government.
An ordinary citizen
Conflict of superiority between judiciary and parliament January 23, 2011
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY.Tags: accountability of judiciary, independence of judiciary
1 comment so far
The controversy started on November 29, 2010 with the summoning of judicial staff by the subcommittee for law and parliamentary affairs.
The judiciary rejected the appeal on the plea that it is not accountable to parliament for its activities.
In reaction, Suranjit Sen Gupta, Chairman of the Parliamentary Subcommittee said that as per constitution parliament is the highest seat of authority. As the people hold the supreme authority and they bestowed their power on the elected members of parliament, it is the parliament who holds the authority over all the organs of the state. He opined that the judiciary also be accountable to parliament.
The chief justice Mr.Khairul Hoque said in a meeting that none is superior among judiciary, parliament and executive branch of the state. They are complementary to each other. the judges are accountable only to Almighty and the people. They express their accountability through the judgments to the people.
The comment of the chief justice drew further comments. Suranjit Sengupta tried to defend himself. Mr. Aminur Rahman a retired judge said that he thinks that it is the parliament to whom the judiciary should remain accountable. Barrister zahiruddin, the leading constitutional expert supported the opinion of the chief justice when asked by the media on the issue. He also said that if the judiciary does not remain independent, the majority party will try to dictate judiciary at its will.
The ordinary citizen respect the dignity and independence of judiciary.
An ordinary citizen
News link:
JS Sovereign-Daily Star
Amnesty International Report 2010 on Bangladesh May 28, 2010
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY.Tags: Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report 2010
add a comment
Following is the excerpt from the
Amnesty International Report 2010 on Bangladesh:
At least 74 people including civilians and army officers were killed during a Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) mutiny in February. After the mutiny, over 3,000 BDR personnel were detained, at least 48 of whom died in custody. Police and security forces were implicated in the alleged extrajudicial executions of up to 70 criminal suspects. At least 64 people were sentenced to death and at least three were executed. Women continued to be victims of acid attacks, rape, beatings and other attacks, with little preventive action from the authorities.
Background
The Awami League government took office in January,
ending two years of an army-backed state of emergency under a civilian caretaker government. The new government endorsed some institutional reforms which the caretaker government had initiated under temporary legislation. These included the Human Rights Commission Act which Parliament enacted in July. The government also set up the Information Commission in July after Parliament passed the Right to Information Act in March.
Repression of dissent
Police continued to use unnecessary and excessive
force against protesters. In September, dozens of police attacked peaceful protesters with batons in Dhaka at a rally organized by the National Committee to Protect Oil, Gas, Mineral Resources, Power and Ports. At least 20 protesters, including one of their leaders, Professor Anu Mohammed, were injured. Some 1,000 protesters were calling for greater transparency in the government’s decision to award contracts to international oil companies. There was no independent investigation of the attack.
BDR rebellion – torture and fear of unfair trials
Members of the BDR launched a large-scale mutiny in February at the BDR headquarters in Dhaka. Mutineers killed at least 74 people, including six civilians, 57 army officers, one army soldier, nine jawans (lowest BDR rank), and one as yet unidentified person. Thousands of BDR personnel were subsequently confined to barracks and denied all outside contact. Reports soon emerged that scores – possibly hundreds – of BDR personnel suffered human rights violations, including torture, for possible involvement in the mutiny. At least 20 BDR personnel died in custody between March and May alone. BDR officials claimed that four men committed suicide, and 16 died from natural causes. By 10 October, the total number of BDR personnel who died in custody was 48. There were allegations that torture may have been the cause or a contributing factor in some of these deaths. An official committee set up in May to investigate the deaths had not submitted its report by year’s end.
An official investigation into the circumstances of the mutiny failed to establish its causes. Another investigation by the Criminal Investigation Department of the police to identify charges against more than 3,000 BDR personnel awaiting trial had not submitted
its report by year’s end. The government confirmed in September that trials for killings, hostage-taking and looting would take place in civilian courts. It was not clear what resources, particularly in terms of additional training for judges, were available to courts
to provide fair trials to such an unprecedented number of defendants.
Indigenous Peoples’ rights
The government began in August to disband major army camps in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) to meet one of several unimplemented agreements of the 1997 CHT peace accord. The accord, signed by the government and CHT representatives, recognized the rights of Indigenous Peoples living in the area and ended more than two decades of insurgency. The government took no action to resolve other unimplemented agreements, including a dispute over land ownership which Indigenous Peoples allege the
army confiscated from them during the insurgency and gave to non-Indigenous Bangladeshis whom the government encouraged to settle there.
Extrajudicial executions
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina pledged in February and October that the government would end extrajudicial executions. However, up to 70 people reportedly died in “crossfire” in the first nine months of the year. Police authorities usually characterized suspected extrajudicial executions as deaths from “crossfire” or after a “shoot-out”. Family members of Mohsin Sheikh, aged 23, and Mohammad Ali Jinnah, aged 22, two Awami League student leaders, alleged that Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) personnel shot the two men dead in Dhaka in May. The RAB claimed that the men disregarded a warning to stop at a checkpoint. It said that in the “gunfight” that followed, the men were shot dead. An autopsy of the bodies showed that none of the bullets fired by RAB officers had gone astray, which suggested that this was a planned killing and not a “gunfight”. Police subsequently opened criminal investigations against 10 RAB personnel, but no one was brought to justice.
Violence against women
Newspapers reported at least 21 cases where a husband had killed his wife because her family could not afford to give him dowry money. Police sources said they had received at least 3,413 complaints of beating and other abuse of women over dowry disputes between January and October. In many of the known cases, prosecution led to conviction, but the authorities failed to develop, fund and implement an action programme to actively prevent violence against women. Women’s rights groups said many
cases of violence against women, such as the alleged rape of sex workers in police custody, were not reported for fear of reprisal and lack of protection. In October, Smrity Begum died after she was allegedly forced by her husband to swallow poison.
He had demanded a motorbike from Smrity Begum’s family as her dowry, which they could not afford. Police charged the husband with murder.
Legal, constitutional or institutional
developments
The Minister of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs announced in August that a tribunal would be set up to hear cases of people accused of human rights abuses during the 1971 independence war, but no such tribunals were set up.
Death penalty
Five men found guilty of killing then President Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1975 had their death sentences upheld by the Supreme Court in November. At least 64 people were sentenced to death and at least three were executed.
Amnesty International visits/reports
Amnesty International delegates visited Bangladesh in April and May.
Looking for justice: Mutineers on trial in Bangladesh
(ASA 13/006/2009)
Bangladesh: Appeals for commutation of death sentences
(ASA 13/007/2009)
[Amnesty International Report 2010 Page 73-74]
Link: Amnesty International
ACC Controversy May 10, 2010
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, CORRUPTION, JUDICIARY.Tags: ACC
add a comment A new controversy arises regarding ACC (Anti- Corruption Commission) of Bangladesh with the comment of Mohiuddin khan Alamgir, MP and Chairman of the Public Acctts Committee of Parliament when he says that ACC should be abolished. He argued that when an organization only serve the purpose of the masters then it has no right to exit. He also urges apology from the present ACC for their wrongdoings during the last Caretaker Government.
Present ACC Chief Golam Rahman denied to apologize arguing that ACC is an institution,not an individual. It can’t apologise to anybody.
If we accept the logic of MKA, then many of the Govt and Non-Govt organizations will be needed to be abolished including the police forces. That will be an absurd thing one can imagine.
We should plea for not to abolish the ACC but to strengthen it and make it more independent and autonomous.
An ordinary citizen
Link: Breaking the ACC’s back- ANM Nurul Hoque in Daily Star
Judicial System -turning into a glass house April 29, 2010
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY.1 comment so far
Ex Chief Justice Mahmud Amin Chowdhury expressed concern over the state of Judiciary in Bangladesh that it is turning into a house made of glass and may crumble at any time.
Recently Govt adopted an ammendment demeaning the power of Anti-corruption commission which was criticized by different quarters including World Bank.
It looks that a section of people is beyond the judisdiction of judiciary.
People have hopes that Govt will take steps to restore the faith of people on the judiciary.
An ordinary citizen
BDR Mutiny: Trial is continuing April 24, 2010
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, BDR mutiny, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: BDR mutiny, MDR Mutiny Trial
add a comment
The trial is continuing for mutiny in the BDR on the 25th February of 2009.
PM said the trial will be completed by this year.
We hope the masterminds behind the masscre would be identified and the accused will get a fair trial.
An ordinary citizen
Link: BDR Mutiny
War Crimes on Trial in Bangladesh March 27, 2010
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: 1971, anti-liberation forces, Jamaat-e-Islami, Liberation war
5 comments
Government has set the stage to start the trial of the war crimes in Bangladesh about 40 years after the war fought for liberation of Bangladesh. It formed the tribunal, fixed the prosecutors and assigned people to inquire into the allegations.
The Government in its first stage listed 25 people, 23 of whom are from Jamaat-e- Islami and 2 from BNP, most of whom are among the top leaders of the parties.
The listed 25 are also present in the list of 50, which was prepared earlier by the Sectors Commanders Forum .
The Chief of the Tribunal assures that no innocent will be punished.
People from different sectors expressed their satisfaction over the event. The Law Minister said that the process may take a little longer time to maintain the transparency and international standard.
Salahuddin Kader Chowdhury, one of the accused and a law maker from BNP reacted saying that it moved by the government to embarrass his party politically and to divert the attention of the people from the failures of the government.
The leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami remain mum on the news and said that as it is legal matter only lawyers will speak over the matter. They are also fixing the lawyers to defend them.
Matiya Chowdhury, a powerful minister of the government said that the sympathizers of the accused may create violence to jeopardize the trial.
The trial of the war crimes is a long awaiting one. Different national crisis and compromise by political parties delays the trail so far. Because of relentless effort by some social groups and increasing awareness of the new generation regarding the liberation war and return of AL to the power make the trial possible.
The trial must be a fair one, transparent and of international standard. The accused also should fight the case legally and at best politically but in no way they should take arms to create violence to jeopardize the legal procedure. That will destroy the last chance of political survival of Jamaat-e-Islami in this country.
An ordinary citizen
Verdict on Bangabandhu killing case: Bangladesh correcting itself November 20, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: Bangabandhu, Sk. Mujibur Rahman
3 comments
Bangladesh Supreme Court in its historical judgement on 19th November 2009 upheld the verdict of the Highcourt on the killing case of Bangabandhu Sk. Mujibur Raman, the father of the nation. High Cort in its last judgment had given the capital punishment to all 12 accused.
Bangabandhu was brutally murdered along with the family members including a minor son Rasel on the night of the 15th August 1975 by a group of armymen. It is speculated that the group had connections with national and international bodies and many individuals.
The case took long 34 years to come to an end. The consirators initially got the indemnity and they were in many ways protected and benfited by the successive governments until in 1996 when the AL-led government repelled the indemnity bill and the case then activated. The progress of the case was delayed many a times for different reasons including shortage of judges and feeling of embarrassment by some of them.
After the new government came to power with massive mandate, it took up the matter with extreme priority and appointed new judges and finished the job at its earliest possible time.
People express their joy, PM Hasina sheds her tears and Barrister Tapash, son of SK. Moni, who was killed on the day, told that the verdict is the best gift on his birthday.
Goverment took extensive measures to thwart any untoward event on the day of judgment and the day passed peacefully.
Friday,the day after the verdict is declared as ‘sokrana day’ and people prayed for the salvation of the departed souls of August 15, 1975.
Bangladesh tried to correct itself of a wrongdoing of killing the father of the nation and changing a government undemocratically and unconstitutionally. But People and the Government must be careful for history not to repeat itself by preventing any situation that may give rise to such unexpected incidents.
An ordinary citizen
ACC is frustrated over its own state and state of judiciary in Bangladesh October 25, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, CORRUPTION, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY.Tags: ACC. Anti-Corruption Commission
2 comments
The Chief of Anti-Corruption Commission(ACC) recently expressed his frustration over ts own state and state of judiaciary in relation to the corruption cases in Bangladesh.
BDnews24.com reports, the chief of watchdog said. ‘ the government is clipping the wings of the Anticorruption Commission, reducing some of its powers, in phases’.
After making the Anticorruption Commission a ‘tiger without teeth’, the process is underway to cut the nails from its claws,” ACC chairman Golam Rahman told reporters.
Rahman also said it is not possible to wipe out corruption due to the existing judicial system.
“It won’t be possible to remove corruption if the judicial system is not reformed in line with the reality,” he said.
“If the judges are not tough against the corrupt people they would continue to commit more corruption under the umbrella of law”.
ACC chairman also commented that, “It is not possible to prevent high-level corruption without a strong political will.
The present government has formed a committee for recommendation on the Anti-Corruption Commission. ACC boss probably reacted to the notice served by the committee.
An ordinary citizen
A George Mia and independence of Judiciary in Bangladesh September 6, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.1 comment so far
In relation to 21st August, 2004 bomb blast event, a George Mia was accused and arrested which later on found to be falsely implicated to save the actual culprits of the murder attempt on the opposition leader and present PM Sk Hasina. Dozens of leaders and workers died on the spot and many injured, the spot turned into a hell, though the PM survived luckily.
George Mia later released but in a recent news he said that he is feeling unsafe and afraid of his own life.
The Government has decided to reinvestigate the whole episode of 21st August to bring the culprits and their patrons to book. Demand also raised to find out the wrongdoers who knowingly involve George Mia in the case.
I was recently listening to a discussion, where to a question to an expert whether a new George Mia will not be created, he couldn’t give any guaranty, the answer points to the frustration over the independence of our judiaciary, though it is said to be separated from the executive.
An ordinary citizen
UK Ministers, abuse of funds and resignations August 7, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: UK, UK Minister Shahid Malik
add a comment
When UK Justice Minister Shadin Malik resigned in June 2009, on the allegation of expending excess public funds, people become aware of the trouble going on in Browns cabinet. Few more ministers resigned on the same ground making the Prime Minister Gordon Brown own post vulnerable to challange.
PM Brown denies to resign saying that the situation is unexpected but not serious enough to resign.
The Labour Party survived the onslaught but it performs poorly in the following local government elections. Most of all, the people lost the faith on the politicans and their respect to the public money.
In a country like Bangladesh, one cannot imagine such a situation. Here Minister resigns if he/she is asked to by the Prime Minister, Otherwise he has no failure and he make no corruption or embezzlement of fund during the tenure of his government. There is no court and no commission which could dare to investigate any allegation against a sitting Minister.
For Bangladesh, probably it will always remain a dream to see a minister resign on the charge of corruption or embezzlement of fund during the tenure of his Government.
An ordinary citizen
The case of Sotomayor: Judging a Judge July 31, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY.Tags: appointment of a Judge, Sotomayor, Supreme Court
1 comment so far
When a seat was vacant in the Supreme Court of USA, after a period of speculation for many, President OBama proposed Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his candidate to fill up the vacant post of retiring Justice David Souter. Soymoto is an Hispanic American working as federal appellate judge Few speculated her name but Obama thought to nominate one who ‘would bring more experience on the bench than anyone currently serving on the Supreme Court’.
Immedaiately MEDIA started to scrutinise her past as a Judge and as a person. Her background has been revealed. Her judgements have been reviwed. Even her speeches at public functions were critically analysed.
Many speak out against her for her judgements, against her attitude.blame her for racism, doubt on her integrity and intellect. She tried to defend her, explained her position and clarified the ambiguity.
Along the process, she had to face the Sente JUdiciary Committee where she had to face quesstions from every angle one can imagine. The Committee appproved the nomination on majority votes.
The final passage would be in the Senate where she gets the approval, she will be the first Hispanic American Justice in the history of America.
In Bangladesh, the appointment is more a secret process. The President has the constitutional power to appoint the judges of the Supreme Court with the consent of the Prime Minister from the sitting judges of the High Court or the advocates of the Judiciary. No public srutiny, no interoggation by the parliamentary committee or voting in the parliament are necessary.
Does the selection process in Bangladesh for judges in the Supreme Court need more screening by the people and parliament?
An ordinary citizen
Postscript:
Sotomayor OK’d for Supreme Court
Anti-Corruption Commission vs Parliamentary Committee May 4, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY.Tags: ACC, Anti-corruption commission, Parliamentary Committee
add a comment
An intriguing debate is going on in Bangladesh as Parliamentary Committee on Public Undertakings summoned past and present acting chairmen and members of the Anti-Corruption Commission(ACC) to come for hearing to the PC to clarify the deeds and accounts of ACC during the period of caretaker government.
None of the members of the ACC agreedto acccept the summon on the plea that PC has no authority on the ACC and ACC is in no way accountable to PC, it is only accountable to the President and they have submitted the Annual Report to the president already.
The chairman and members of the PC argued that Parliament is the supreme authority and everybody/ every department is accountable to the parliament. They also threated the members of ACC that not to appear before the Committee will be tentamount to the comptempt of the Parliament and which may end in jail or fine of the members.
It is not clear whether the said Parlimentary Committee has the authority over Election Commission or Supreme Court to vaify their activites and accounts as these departments are also thrive on the public money.
The experts are divided. Though the ACC is not a constitutional body by rules but it is such by spirit. In no way ACC should be accountable to a committee that is chaired by a ‘convict’. He may has own grievances to call the ACC which had drawn the proccedings for which he was found guily by the High Count and he is now under special bail and staying out of the jail. It is alleged that he may has done this out of malafide intention.
We want the ACC to be strong enough to combat the corruption in our country, to be independent to challenge and charge anybody, not to be accountable to person/s who proved guilty by the court and the members should have a dignified and honourable life.
Most of all , we want to see the ACC to be a constitutional body.
Will the controversy be referred to the Supreme Court for an ultimate decision?
An ordinry citizen
Opinion:
Under the debate of Govt vs ACC(bn)-Mijanur Rahman Khan
Parlimantary Committee Vs ACC-Citizen’s thoughts-(bn) Badiul Alam Majumdar
ACC-the main issue shouldn’t be bypassed(bn)- Maloy Bhoumik
Hope for local governments fades away in Bangladesh April 8, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY, local government, POLITICS.Tags: upazilla parishad
add a comment
A strong opinion for local governments election was created during the caretaker government. Though the upazilla parishad election could not be completed during the tenure of the caretaker government, but election of 4 city corporations and 11 municipalities was held under EC during the last CTG.
Due to pressure from the political parties, EC had to set the upazilla election on 22nd January, 2009 after the parliamentary election on 29th December, 2008. Amid much speculation, AL led government held the upazilla election as scheduled.
After the election people thought that local governments will be strengthen in Bangladesh after a long time. But when the law is passed, people find the local government ordinance passed by the CTG is molded to such an extent that the power and independence of the upazilla chairman is curtailed and the advice of the MPs has been made mandatory for the upazilla parishads, even the upazilla chairman could not directly contact the government without MPs’ recommendation.
In the parliament, MPs from both the GOP and opposition unanimously supported the move. The Minister for local government himself proposed the truncated law as suggested by the parliamentary committee on the local government.
The upazilla chairmen all over the country criticized the power delegated to the MPs over them. The citizen groups raised their concern and expressed their frustration on the subjugating them to the authority of the MPs. Dr. Shahdin Malik, a Jurist said that the Upazilla law that is enacted by the present parliament is contradictory to the constitution and the amendment in the law will be challenged in the High Court. He argued that the same reason for which a upazilla chairman cannot make law, an MP also can’t hold the executive authority at the upazilla level.
Many urge the government to review the law and to set the law in the true spirit to strengthen the local government in Bangladesh.
A writer and blogger from Philippines came to visit Bangladesh few months back. He commented that there is little difference between the central governments between two countries but the they feel proud for their local governments which are much stronger in Philippines than in Bangladesh.
We also want to see our local governments stronger.
An ordinary citizen
Linked news:
Resignation of Hasan Mashhud and an Independent Anti-Corruption Commission April 3, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, CORRUPTION, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: ACC, Anti-corruption commission, Lt Gen (Rt) Hasan Mashhud Chowdhury
add a comment
Lt General(Rt) Hasan Mashhud has resigned from the post of Chairman of Anti-Corruption Commission. He was appointed during the tenure of last Caretaker Goverment. He took up the job as a mission ‘to remove corruption from Bangladesh politics and Administration’. As a part to achieve his objectives, ACC filed charges against hundreds of politicians,some beaucrates and few businessmen. Many politicians including two Prme Ministers were arrested and put under arrest for months together but most of them came out of the jail on the verdict of the higher courts or with the change of the government.
He also tried to develop awareness against the corruption as a part of social movement for which he travelled different parts of the country and led many processions of students and of common people.
Politicians of both the major parties were critical of treatment of them by ACC during the Caretaker government.
He didn’t directly blame anybody and told in a brief press conference before his leaving the office that a new leadership is necessary for Anti-Corruption Commission in the changed environement.
The State Minister of Law Advocate Kamrul Islam has expressed satisfaction on his resignation. BNP leaders asked to inquire into the corruption of the former ACC Chairman during his tenure. Citizens’ leaders Professor Muzaffar Ahmed and Dr. Akbar Ali Khan expressed concern on his resignation.
Politicians will feel relief with the resignation of the General Mashhud. But many people will remember him as a crusader who tried to contain corruption but failed to succeed for necessary legal, political, administrative and policy support.
With the resignation of General Mashhud, the responsibility of the new goverrnment is rather increased. People want to see an independent Anti-Corruption Commissison working in Bangladesh which is equally important for this government to achieve its goal of vision 2021.
The ordinary citizens would like the government to heed the point and would take necessary steps to make the ACC independent and effective.
An ordinary citizen
Opinions:
Out with the lonely warrior- Daily Star
Who will be affected on Mushhud’s resignation? Motiur Rahman Prothom Alo
But the fighte still remains- Abdullah A dewan, Michigan University
A judge is changing the face of Pakistan March 16, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: Asif Ali Zardary, Iftekhar Muhammed Choudhry, Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan
1 comment so far
Pakistan again came to limelight of the international news with the long march of opposition lead by Nawaj Sharif and others for reinstatement of Chief Justice Iftekhar Muhammed Choudhry.
President Zardari took the matter differently, banned the rally and meetings and ordered Nawaj Sharif to keep under house arrest. He defied the ban and joined the march towards Islamabad to gherao parliament. Nawaz Sharif complained that Zardari violated the initial agreement where they agreed to reinstate Chief Justice and about 60 other Judges who were overthrown by the Mushaarraf Military Government. Earlier he left the government coalition,the Supreme Court disqualified Nowaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz, Governor of Panjab to compete in the election.
Chief of Army Kayani intervened in the development and asked Zardari to reinstate Iftekhar to the post of Chief Justice.
At the climax of the event, when people were speculating everything, Gilani, the Prime Minister of Pakistan declared the reinstatement of the former Chief Justice.
Iftekhar Muhammed Choudhry spearheaded the fall of Musharraf in 2008 after he was sacked by Musharraf in 2007 for challenging the president’s irregularities. Musharrf compelled to arrange general election and pave the way for the political government to come to the power. We were observing from then on how stubborn and courageous a man could be that he defies the red eye of a military dictator, who had the blessings of the superpower and whose support USA was counting dearly for its war against terrorism. He took the physical and mental stress to organize the meetings and processions in different streets and towns. Bombs disrupted his meeting and lawyers were killed and injured. He was jailed and put behind the bars. Zardari after taking the power forget to reinstate Iftekhan as Zardari was charged for corruption and he was afraid that Eftekhar may not compromise with a sitting president on the issue of corruption. Newaj Sharif was all along insisting on the pledge to fulfill and ultimately succeeded in his endeavor.
This change may consolidate democracy and uphold justice in Pakistan.
We also appreciate the decision of the resignation of Minister of Information, who is a memeber of Bhutto family on the move of the government to restrict the media coverage of the movement.
An ordinary citizen
Tracing the trial of war criminals February 16, 2009
Posted by bdoza in BANGLADESH, GOVERNANCE, JUDICIARY, POLITICS.Tags: 1971, anti-liberation forces, Jamaat-e-Islami, Liberation war, War crimes
1 comment so far
Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Shafique Ahmed yesterday said trial of war criminals is one of the main election pledges of the government. He hinted that steps would be taken to try the war criminals under the International Crime Tribunal Act-1973.
Jamaat is the biggest enemy of Islam, says Shahtiar Kabir
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina yesterday sought help of the United Nations in holding trial of the war criminals, saying prosecuting them has become a national demand.
Jatiya Sangshad adopted resolution for trial of war criminals in 29th January 2009.
Leaders of Citizens’ Commissionon Trial of War Criminals called for initiating the trial by forming a special tribunal as per International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973.
Govt moves to bar war criminals to flee.
War criminals should be punished even if they belong to Jamaat, BNP and Awami League, Shibir said.
Speakers at a discussion urged the government to form a special tribunal for trial of the war criminals as they said it was a special crime.
The US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Richard A Boucher said the US would not hesitate to provide assistance, if necessary, in trying the war criminals in Bangladesh.
CPB refutes the idea.
Delwar questions the fair trial of the war crimes.
US welcomes the move of the trial of war criminals.
Jamaat plans to say sorry for 1971 political stance, not war crime; sideline controversial leaders; accept trial under UN.
Sector Commanders, intellectuals, lawyers and academicians suggested that the new government form a special tribunall and a commission to try the war criminals and collect evidences of war crimes.
Murder case, not war crimes, being probed against 2 Rajshahi arrestees; govt yet to start war criminal trial process.
Regarding trial of war criminals, Law Minister Shafique Ahmed said the government has enough information, data and proofs about the war crimes.He said the government would take steps to try the war criminals. “A tribunal will be formed after an investigation into the crimes.”
Pakistan envoy said ‘Time is not right to try 1971 war criminals’
Shahriar Kabir, Secretary General of Ghatak Dalal Nirmul Committee said that involvement of UN will make unnecessary delay of the trial.
Govt seeks evidence from Pakistan, US; UN named four experts to help probe
Amnesty International welcomes the UN help in war criimes trial
Process of war crimes trial kicks off 8 April, 2009. UN Resident Representative in Bangladesh Ms Renata said mistakes have been made in trials of war criminals in many countries.
Govt to amend law following Nuremberg Trial
War crimes trial process gets final shape
An ordinary citizen











