jump to navigation

Judiciary couldn’t live upto the expectation of the people in Bangladesh November 9, 2008

Tags: ,
1 comment so far

Judiciary was separated from the executive under the caretaker government just over an year after the many years of endevour by the people.

The past political governments didn’t fulfill the pledge of separating the judiciary though they were pledging separation since long.

The separation was also vehemently opposed by Administration cadre of Bangladesh. Ultimately it was separated by the present caretaker government.

People hoped that with the separation of judiciary, it will act independently and will uphold the rule of law. But the people’s expectation was not fulfilled.

It was seen that the long hand of the administration on the judiciary was not over. Political cases including cases of corruption were not dealt unbiased. Bails were given or rejected, the reasons were not clear to the public as well as to experts as well.

To the government, a political compromise becomes more important than the rule of law and punishment of the corrupts and criminals.

It seems that the intention of the government is also imposed on the judiciary.
People are not sure when they will get a judiciary, not only separated but also independent.
The image and independence of the judiciary now absolutely depends on the judges themselves. How perfectly they could uphold the justice and how they could keep themselves above the greed and temptation will determine the image of the judiciary in future.

I liked the idea of the past Chief Justice Mr. Ruhul Amin when he was advocating the dignity and the prestige of the judges in meetings and seminars. Communication with the people is also important. It sometimes clears the confusion in the minds of the ordinary citizens.

The present Chief Justice may also come forward and take the opportunity through different seminars and meetings to communicate with the people.

An ordinary citizen

Post script:
A report on Judiciary [PA]

Case against the above report was filed in the High Court [PA]